Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard E. Siferd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 01:36, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Richard E. Siferd

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsuccessful candidate in an election, no other claim to notability. Has been tagged for notability issues since 2010, but no other sources have popped up to prove there's anything other than his status as a candidate to justify an article. High COI as well--creator is RSIferd (talk · contribs). HangingCurve^{Swing for the fence} 20:11, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unsuccessful nominee in an election 8 years ago with no independent sources or indication of notability. Tiller54 (talk) 17:26, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable as nominee for federal office. None of the online bios I found (including for his firm) suggest other grounds for notability and a few quick Google searches turned up nothing of note. – Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 03:57, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per above and fails both WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:24, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.